The pact included measures such as the rapid withdrawal of troops, avoidance of measures that could aggravate tensions, compliance with all agreements and protocols on border management, and measures to restore peace along the line of effective control. “I spoke with State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi this afternoon. We discussed the implementation of our Moscow agreement and looked at the status of the withdrawal,” Jaishankar said in a tweet on Thursday. It reaffirms the process of dialogue, withdrawal and de-escalation of the situation. All this has been comprehensively addressed in the five previous agreements listed below: the agreement reached during last year`s exchange between Indian Foreign Minister S Jaishankar and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Moscow should continue to guide the work of both sides in de-escalation and peacemaking along the LAC, a meeting of the border affairs teams of the two countries, which was agreed today. The two sides also agreed to continue the dialogue in order to reach a “mutually acceptable solution for a complete detachment from all points of friction at the earliest”. At a press briefing, the official said Moscow welcomes the agreements between India and China to resolve the issue. 3. The two ministers agreed that the two sides will abide by all existing agreements and protocols on China-India border issues, maintain peace and tranquility in border areas, and avoid any measures that could aggravate the situation. Foreign ministers of India and China Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and Wang Yi reached a “five-point agreement” during their talks in Moscow on the sidelines of the SCO summit on September 10 to reduce tensions on the Ladakh border. The Indian Express speaks with Major General Prof. G. G.
Dwivedi (retired), who commands troops in this sector and served as a defense attaché in China to put these talks into perspective. Additional agreements are not necessary. The point of contention is their implementation, as they have been violated by the People`s Liberation Army in pursuit of its “nibble and negotiate” strategy. In fact, all of these agreements have only helped China consolidate its claims over a period of time by waging a “bulletless” war. • The 1993 Peace and Tranquillity Agreement forms the basis for all subsequent agreements. “The Indian side has made it clear that it expects all agreements on border zone management to be fully respected and that it does not tolerate any attempt to unilaterally change the status quo. It was also pointed out that Indian troops have scrupulously followed all agreements and protocols to administer the border areas,” the sources said. Moscow [Russia], March 5 (ANI): Russia said on Thursday that it is monitoring the situation on the Sino-Indian border and welcomes the agreements between the two sides within the existing framework of multi-level bilateral dialogue mechanisms. Jaishankar told his Chinese counterpart that India remains concerned about the gathering of Chinese troops in the LAC, which is not in line with the 1993 and 1996 agreements. There was “no credible explanation for this operation which, as the minister said, had created hot spots along the LAC.
Foreign Minister S Jaishankar held talks with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi on Thursday and discussed the implementation of their “Moscow agreement” on the border situation in eastern Ladakh and the review of the state of withdrawal. A five-point agreement was reached between Jaishankar and Wang at a meeting in Moscow on September 10 on the sidelines of a Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) conclave. “We welcome the agreements reached by the foreign ministers of China and India during the February 25 telephone conversation,” she added. The Chinese press release also said that Jaishankar said that India “does not make the development of Indochinese relations dependent on the resolution of the border issue and that India does not want to go back.” 5. Ministers agreed that as the situation calms down, both sides should accelerate work to develop further confidence-building measures to maintain and improve peace and tranquillity in border areas. 2. The two foreign ministers agreed that the current situation in the border areas is not in the interest of both sides. They therefore agreed that border troops from both sides should continue their dialogue, withdraw quickly, maintain adequate distance and reduce tensions. 4.
The two sides also agreed to continue dialogue and communication on the special representative`s mechanism on the Indochinese border issue. .